The Foggy Boundary
Problem: As the context window ($N$) expands, the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of the attention mechanism degrades. We call this the "Foggy Boundary."
Implementation details act as "entropy," drowning out architectural invariants. The result is "Lost in the Middle"—the model retrieves code but fails to reason about its constraints.
Attention SNR Degradation Curve
The Spatial Constraint Protocol
SCP is not a model weight modification. It is a rigorous **Context Management Framework** built on three pillars: RAG Denial, Semantic Prompting, and Hybrid Verification.
01. RAG Denial (Context Isolation)
Standard RAG retrieves implementation details, causing contamination. SCP denies access to implementation, showing only Interface Contracts.
Risk: Model may hallucinate based on 'db.connect' logic intended to be private.
02. High-Density Prompting
We use the Chevron DSL (based on Uiua glyphs) to maximize Information Per Token (IPT). These "High-Density Anchor Tokens" create spikes in attention, locking architectural constraints with minimal noise.
The "Chevron" Glossary
03. The Weaver: Hybrid Verification
1. Static Analysis
Deterministic AST parsing checks for forbidden imports and global state mutations.
2. Neural Verification
Heuristic LLM pass verifies semantic intent and Chevron contract adherence.
Verified Code
Code is committed only if both checks pass.
Case Study: Resolving "Regression Hell"
Applied to a Windows/CUDA engineering project (~50k LOC). Comparison between Standard RAG and SCP.
Regression Rate
-99.3% ReductionPercentage of new features causing defects in existing code.
Context Compression
106x ImprovementTokens required to maintain architectural coherence (Log Scale).